Microfinance: Difference between revisions
imported>Nick Gardner |
imported>Nick Gardner |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
==Regulation== | ==Regulation== | ||
<!-- | |||
Microfi nance has been one of the great business success stories of the last decade. But the sector’s | |||
impressive growth and outreach has not been matched by a comprehensive supervisory and regulatory | |||
structure that refl ects its unique characteristics and risks. To close this gap, the Association of Supervisors | |||
of Banks of the Americas (ASBA) and the Multilateral Investment Fund (MIF)—with support from the | |||
Swiss Trust Fund managed by the Inter-American Development Bank—engaged in a two-year consultation | |||
in Latin America and the Caribbean to prepare practical guidelines for regulating and supervising | |||
microfi nance. | |||
These guidelines seek to complement the standards and laws under which a country’s fi nancial | |||
institutions operate. Microfi nance institutions (MFIs) are subject to national standards and, in the | |||
majority of cases, international standards that allow for sound management of the fi nancial system. | |||
But international standards are not always applied with suffi cient rigour, and neither international nor | |||
national standards always consider the special nature of microfi nance operations. There is, for example, | |||
a need to broaden the application of the Basel Core Principles (BCP) to create a legal framework that | |||
effectively regulates MFIs—but without imposing conditions that would impede their operations. Yet | |||
guidelines must also build on existing standards because MFIs and traditional fi nancial providers have | |||
a lot in common. With some adjustments, the majority of the Basel principles are applicable to the | |||
microfi nance sector. | |||
The need to regulate and supervise banks rigorously is rarely challenged; the same cannot be said of | |||
<ref>[http://www.cgap.org/gm/document-1.9.2787/Guideline_RegSup.pdf Robert Peck, Christen Timothy R. Lyman and Richard Rosenberg ''Microfinance Consensus Guidelines: Guiding Princiles on Regulation and Supervision of Microfinance'', CGAP 2003]</ref> | <ref>[http://www.cgap.org/gm/document-1.9.2787/Guideline_RegSup.pdf Robert Peck, Christen Timothy R. Lyman and Richard Rosenberg ''Microfinance Consensus Guidelines: Guiding Princiles on Regulation and Supervision of Microfinance'', CGAP 2003]</ref> | ||
--> | |||
==Evaluation== | ==Evaluation== |
Revision as of 05:14, 27 January 2011
Microfinance is a term that is applied to a wide variety of means of supplying small-scale finance to people who are unable to obtain it from conventional sources, including microfinance institutions (MFIs) that require every borrower to be a member of a mutually-supportive group. Microfinance institutions are widely used to alleviate poverty throughout the developing countries and in Europe, the United States and Japan. Some are self-sustaining, but most are dependant upon subsidies or donations.
Definitions
The term microfinance has been applied to many of the informal sources of finance that are used by poor people who cannot borrow money from conventional banks. It has also been used to refer specifically to the supply of finance by "Microfinance Institutions" (or MFIs) to members of mutually supportive groups. It is usually associated with institutions that involve the supply of finance from outside a group, as distinct from institutions that use savings that are raised within a group (such as credit cooperatives, and rotating savings and credit associations [1]), and as distinct from organisations that lend to independant individuals. It is not uncommon, however, for members of a single group to use several informal sources of credit. The term is usually applied to the provision of credit, and is often referred to as "microcredit", but it is also applicable to insurance, money transfers and leasing. The term "Microfinance Investment Vehicle" (MIV) denotes a private entity which acts as an intermediary between investors and microfinance institutions [2]. The term "inclusive finance" has been used to refer to the ideal of a financial system from which the poor are not excluded[3].
Microfinance Institutions
"Today the Norwegian Nobel Committee wishes to express its admiration for the work Muhammad Yunus and Grameen Bank have done for thousands upon thousands of ordinary people in Bangladesh and in many other countries. We hope the Peace Prize will be a source of inspiration in the continuing work for a world without poverty."
|
The best-known microfinance institution is the Grameen Bank[4]. It was launched as the Grameen Project in the village of Jobra, Bangladesh in 1976, and was given the legal status of a bank in 1983. Borrowers hold 95 percent of its equity, and the rest is held by the government of Bangladesh. Loans are financed from deposits, without subsidies or contributions from donors. Every borrower must belong to a five-member group and individual borrowing is monitored by the group, but responsibility for repayment rests solely on the individual and is not legally enforceable. Collateral is not required . Loans average $120 and totalled $750 million in 2009. The interest rates charged to borrowers are 20 per cent for income-generating loans, 8 per cent for housing loans and 5 per cent for student loans, and interest-free loans are granted to "struggling members" (beggars). The interest rates paid to depositors range from 8.5 per cent to 12 per cent. The bank has over 8 millon borrowers in Bangladesh, 97 per cent of whom are women. Its Grameen Trust [5] also provides training, funds and technical assistance to replica programmes in other countries. By the end of 2010 it had supported 141 replication partners in 38 countries.
Other MFIs differ widely in size, scope, and source of finance. Some are financial cooperatives, funding their lending from members’ loans and deposits. Others have acted solely as intermediaries (termed microfinance investment vehicles) that channel funds from donors or from commercial sources. Some have developed from intermediaries into self-sustaining deposit-taking institutions, and some have formed ties with commercial banks. Some have achieved sustainability by serving borrowers that are above the poverty line, but those that have concentrated upon lending to the very poor have tended to remain dependent upon donations[6]. Estimates of the number of borrowers worldwide range from 133 million (2007) to 190 million (2004[7].
MFIs operate in very nearly every developing country[8], and also in Europe [9], the United States[10], and Japan[11]. There are several sources of information about individual MFIs. The Microfinance Information Exchange lists 1800 MFIs in over 120 countries in Africa, Latin America and The Caribbean, East Asia and the Pacific, the Middle East and North Africa, Eastern Europe and Central Asia, and South Asia[12]. Performance data for more than 1000 MFIs reaching over 85% of known microfinance borrowers are available from the Microfinance Information Exchange[13] and information about interest rates is being collected by the MFI Transparency organisation[14]
Sponsorship and funding
"The stark reality is that most poor people in the world still lack access to sustainable financial services, whether it is savings, credit or insurance. The great challenge before us is to address the constraints that exclude people from full participation in the financial sector…Together, we can and must build inclusive financial sectors that help people improve their lives."
|
In February 1997, the first Microcredit Summit[15] - a meeting of heads of state attended by 3,000 participants from 137 countries - agreed upon the objective of providing access to microcredit to 100 million of the world’s poorest families by the end of 2005. In July 2003 a meeting of the United Nations General Assembly adopted a programme of action[16] for the International Year of Microcredit, 2005[17], and in 2005 the Microcredit Summit extended its target to 175 million by the end of 2015.
A survey of 150 microfinance donors, investors and microfinance investment vehicles showed their total commitment to have reached $21.3 billion at the end of 2009[18]. Public sector funds predominated , but there was also a substantial private sector contribution. A survey of 78 private-sector microfinance investment vehicles, showed their total investment in the period 2005-2009 as over $6 billion[19], of which $4.2 billion had been contributed to microfinance projects (the balance of their investors' funds being held in reserve as liquid assets).
Regulation
Evaluation
References
- ↑ Christy Chung Hevener: Alternative Financial Vehicles: Rotating Savings and Credit Associations (ROSCAs), Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, November 2006
- ↑ Microfinance Investment Vehicles, International Association of Microfinance Investment Vehicles, 2008
- ↑ Building Inclusive Financial Sectors for Development,UN Publications, May 2006
- ↑ Grameen Bank at a glance, December 2010
- ↑ Grameen Trust website
- ↑ Microfinance: A View from the Fund, International Monetary Fund, 2005
- ↑ Number of Borrowers, Consultative Group to Assist the Poor, 2011
- ↑ Roberto Moro Visconti: A Survey on Microfinance for Developing Countries, October 2008
- ↑ Conference on Microfinance in Europe, European Commission, November 2010
- ↑ Microfinance USA 2010, Conference May 2010
- ↑ Yoichi Izumida: Microfinance and Poverty: The Japanese Experiences, Asian Development Bank Institute,
- ↑ Microfinance Institutions, The Microfinance Information Exchange, 2010
- ↑ 2009 MFI Benchmarks Microfinance Information Exchange, October 2010
- ↑ MFI Transparency, 2011
- ↑ Microcredit Summit, 2-4 February 1997, position paper by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
- ↑ United Nations General Assembly Fifty-eighth session, Item 100 of the provisional agenda: Implementation of the first United Nations Decade for the Eradication of Poverty (1997-2006)
- ↑ International Year of Microcredit, 2005
- ↑ Cross-border Funding (2010), CGAP, 2010
- ↑ The MicroRate 2010 MIV Survey, MicroRate, July 2010