Talk:Portuguese cuisine/Catalogs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Hayford Peirce (Where is a Chef de Cuisine when you need one?) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:::Geez, I don't understand a bit of the above. I just made this to fit in with all the other catalogs in [[Cuisine/Catalogs]]. Although I freely admit that all of those other might need changing/renaming also. This whole Catalog/Subpages/Catalogs-within-Catalogs is beyond me! But I'll let you gentlemen do whatever you want with them. The key, though, is *consistency*. If Portugese cuisine catalog is renamed, then Austrian, Belgian, Chinese, etc., should be too.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 10:36, 5 November 2007 (CST) | :::Geez, I don't understand a bit of the above. I just made this to fit in with all the other catalogs in [[Cuisine/Catalogs]]. Although I freely admit that all of those other might need changing/renaming also. This whole Catalog/Subpages/Catalogs-within-Catalogs is beyond me! But I'll let you gentlemen do whatever you want with them. The key, though, is *consistency*. If Portugese cuisine catalog is renamed, then Austrian, Belgian, Chinese, etc., should be too.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 10:36, 5 November 2007 (CST) | ||
It's not that complicated, is it? (He said, hopefully.) In short, we aren't using "catalog of..." or "list of..." titles anymore, period. All such articles are now located under [[Topic Name/Catalogs]] when there will be just one catalog for a topic, or else [[Topic Name/Catalogs/This catalog]] when there are several catalogs for a topic. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:41, 5 November 2007 (CST) | It's not that complicated, is it? (He said, hopefully.) In short, we aren't using "catalog of..." or "list of..." titles anymore, period. All such articles are now located under [[Topic Name/Catalogs]] when there will be just one catalog for a topic, or else [[Topic Name/Catalogs/This catalog]] when there are several catalogs for a topic. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:41, 5 November 2007 (CST) | ||
:"Oh," he said cheerily (Hey, we should have an article about [[Tom Swifties]]!). Well, then, I guess we need a real ''Chef de Cuisine'' to do a lot of renaming and moving! I'm gonna stick to the [[Famous tennis players]] for the moment, moving all of those low-lying names up into the main table now that I've been shown how to do it.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 11:28, 5 November 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 12:28, 5 November 2007
Should this not be Catalog of Portuguese Catalogs? --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 02:40, 5 November 2007 (CST)
- Or a catalog in the article Portugese cuisine. Chris Day (talk) 05:26, 5 November 2007 (CST)
- Definitely the latter:-) --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 07:20, 5 November 2007 (CST)
- Geez, I don't understand a bit of the above. I just made this to fit in with all the other catalogs in Cuisine/Catalogs. Although I freely admit that all of those other might need changing/renaming also. This whole Catalog/Subpages/Catalogs-within-Catalogs is beyond me! But I'll let you gentlemen do whatever you want with them. The key, though, is *consistency*. If Portugese cuisine catalog is renamed, then Austrian, Belgian, Chinese, etc., should be too.... Hayford Peirce 10:36, 5 November 2007 (CST)
- Definitely the latter:-) --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 07:20, 5 November 2007 (CST)
It's not that complicated, is it? (He said, hopefully.) In short, we aren't using "catalog of..." or "list of..." titles anymore, period. All such articles are now located under Topic Name/Catalogs when there will be just one catalog for a topic, or else Topic Name/Catalogs/This catalog when there are several catalogs for a topic. --Larry Sanger 10:41, 5 November 2007 (CST)
- "Oh," he said cheerily (Hey, we should have an article about Tom Swifties!). Well, then, I guess we need a real Chef de Cuisine to do a lot of renaming and moving! I'm gonna stick to the Famous tennis players for the moment, moving all of those low-lying names up into the main table now that I've been shown how to do it.... Hayford Peirce 11:28, 5 November 2007 (CST)