Archive:What's Your Message?: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
This is a new initiative proposal. | This is a new initiative proposal. | ||
== What's Your Message? == | |||
It seems that everyone has a blog these days. Everyone has a Message they want to get out to the world. | |||
So the ''Citizendium'' has a challenge: sum up, in 5,000 words or less, what your One Message is. You want to change the world? Explain how. You want to enlighten people about vegetarianism, or Christianity, or the Iraq War, or war and peace generally? Have at it. You think you know the secret of happiness, or the purpose of life? Please tell us. | |||
This is your open letter to the world, posted in a serious venue. | |||
There are two basic rules, though. First, you and only you may write your message. It reflects your views alone. Second, it cannot be abusive. You may ''calmly criticize'' political and religious figures to your heart's content, but you may not be ''abusive,'' even to them. | |||
== Why? How is this related to the ''Citizendium'' and its main goal? == | |||
There's a need for ''What's Your Message?'' There isn't a central--and credible--place where you can go where you can | |||
See also [[CZ:What's Your Article?|What's Your Article?]] | |||
Revision as of 02:29, 23 September 2007
This is a new initiative proposal.
What's Your Message?
It seems that everyone has a blog these days. Everyone has a Message they want to get out to the world.
So the Citizendium has a challenge: sum up, in 5,000 words or less, what your One Message is. You want to change the world? Explain how. You want to enlighten people about vegetarianism, or Christianity, or the Iraq War, or war and peace generally? Have at it. You think you know the secret of happiness, or the purpose of life? Please tell us.
This is your open letter to the world, posted in a serious venue.
There are two basic rules, though. First, you and only you may write your message. It reflects your views alone. Second, it cannot be abusive. You may calmly criticize political and religious figures to your heart's content, but you may not be abusive, even to them.
There's a need for What's Your Message? There isn't a central--and credible--place where you can go where you can
See also What's Your Article?