Talk:Pythagorean theorem: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick
No edit summary
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
Wikipedia's article on this topic is so good that I'm tempted to copy it over to here.  Thoughts? [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 22:20, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
Wikipedia's article on this topic is so good that I'm tempted to copy it over to here.  Thoughts? [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 22:20, 15 May 2007 (CDT)


:Too many proofs on that page.  I got tired of reading and never made it to the uses, etc.  I would suggest you limit our article to a few of the more famous proofs and see about making the history section a little less dry.[[User:Joe Quick|--Joe Quick]]  ([[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]]) 22:48, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
:Too many proofs on that page.  I got tired of reading and never made it to the uses, etc.  I would suggest you limit our article to a few of the more famous proofs and see about making the history section a little less dry.[[User:Joe Quick|--Joe Quick]]  ([[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]]) 22:48, 15 May 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 15:10, 13 November 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition In a right triangle, the squared length of the side opposite the right angle is equal to the sum of the squared lengths of the two other sides. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Mathematics [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Wikipedia's article on this topic is so good that I'm tempted to copy it over to here. Thoughts? Michael Hardy 22:20, 15 May 2007 (CDT)

Too many proofs on that page. I got tired of reading and never made it to the uses, etc. I would suggest you limit our article to a few of the more famous proofs and see about making the history section a little less dry.--Joe Quick (Talk) 22:48, 15 May 2007 (CDT)