Talk:Oriental (word): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Will Nesbitt |
imported>Robert W King |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
I left this from an old Wikipedia article and culled it from some sources that I dug up. It sort of evolved into a defense of the term oriental because of a perceived (by me) assault on the term for political reasons on Wikipedia. I'm open for discussion and glad to help edit. [[User:Will Nesbitt|Will Nesbitt]] 09:37, 23 June 2007 (CDT) | I left this from an old Wikipedia article and culled it from some sources that I dug up. It sort of evolved into a defense of the term oriental because of a perceived (by me) assault on the term for political reasons on Wikipedia. I'm open for discussion and glad to help edit. [[User:Will Nesbitt|Will Nesbitt]] 09:37, 23 June 2007 (CDT) | ||
::I don't think there's any problem of that here, so I'll have to agree with a notion John might have been getting at--there's no point/reason for it, unless you can justify otherwise.--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:56, 23 June 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 08:56, 23 June 2007
Workgroup category or categories | Linguistics Workgroup, Geography Workgroup, Sociology Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | Yes |
Checklist last edited by | John Stephenson 05:08, 22 June 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
Reasons for this article?
As it stands, this article sourced from Wikipedia and modified by Will Nesbitt seems to be defending the use of the term 'Oriental'. Recommend some modifications. John Stephenson 05:11, 22 June 2007 (CDT)
I left this from an old Wikipedia article and culled it from some sources that I dug up. It sort of evolved into a defense of the term oriental because of a perceived (by me) assault on the term for political reasons on Wikipedia. I'm open for discussion and glad to help edit. Will Nesbitt 09:37, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
- I don't think there's any problem of that here, so I'll have to agree with a notion John might have been getting at--there's no point/reason for it, unless you can justify otherwise.--Robert W King 09:56, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Linguistics Category Check
- General Category Check
- Geography Category Check
- Sociology Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Linguistics Advanced Articles
- Linguistics Nonstub Articles
- Linguistics Internal Articles
- Geography Advanced Articles
- Geography Nonstub Articles
- Geography Internal Articles
- Sociology Advanced Articles
- Sociology Nonstub Articles
- Sociology Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Linguistics Developed Articles
- Geography Developed Articles
- Sociology Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Linguistics Developing Articles
- Geography Developing Articles
- Sociology Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Linguistics Stub Articles
- Geography Stub Articles
- Sociology Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Linguistics External Articles
- Geography External Articles
- Sociology External Articles
- Linguistics Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Geography Underlinked Articles
- Sociology Underlinked Articles
- Linguistics Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Geography Cleanup
- Sociology Cleanup