CZ Talk:Editorial Council Suggestion Box: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*Unless I am misinterpreting what this represents, that is ''oligarchy'', and a horrible direction for an online representative democracy. Authors should have ''representatives'' within the voting body that drives the project. This will kill this project unless remedied, and [http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/03/28/we-aint-elitist/ "We Ain't Elitist"] needs a formal retraction. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 14:19, 29 May 2007 (CDT) | *Unless I am misinterpreting what this represents, that is ''oligarchy'', and a horrible direction for an online representative democracy. Authors should have ''representatives'' within the voting body that drives the project. This will kill this project unless remedied, and [http://blog.citizendium.org/2007/03/28/we-aint-elitist/ "We Ain't Elitist"] needs a formal retraction. [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 14:19, 29 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
I always thought this is what we would do--either that, or have a separate body. Certainly, let's draw up a resolution about how to get author representation in the Council. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 14:26, 29 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:26, 29 May 2007
"Last vote was 24-0 indicating 24 decide for all of the community - where authors cannot vote."
- Unless I am misinterpreting what this represents, that is oligarchy, and a horrible direction for an online representative democracy. Authors should have representatives within the voting body that drives the project. This will kill this project unless remedied, and "We Ain't Elitist" needs a formal retraction. Stephen Ewen 14:19, 29 May 2007 (CDT)
I always thought this is what we would do--either that, or have a separate body. Certainly, let's draw up a resolution about how to get author representation in the Council. --Larry Sanger 14:26, 29 May 2007 (CDT)