Talk:Pythagorean theorem: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick
No edit summary
imported>Andrey Khalyavin
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Pythagorean theorem
|                cat1 = Mathematics
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 3
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Andrey Khalyavin|Andrey Khalyavin]] 07:31, 27 June 2007 (CDT)
}}
Wikipedia's article on this topic is so good that I'm tempted to copy it over to here.  Thoughts? [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 22:20, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
Wikipedia's article on this topic is so good that I'm tempted to copy it over to here.  Thoughts? [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 22:20, 15 May 2007 (CDT)


:Too many proofs on that page.  I got tired of reading and never made it to the uses, etc.  I would suggest you limit our article to a few of the more famous proofs and see about making the history section a little less dry.[[User:Joe Quick|--Joe Quick]]  ([[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]]) 22:48, 15 May 2007 (CDT)
:Too many proofs on that page.  I got tired of reading and never made it to the uses, etc.  I would suggest you limit our article to a few of the more famous proofs and see about making the history section a little less dry.[[User:Joe Quick|--Joe Quick]]  ([[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]]) 22:48, 15 May 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 07:31, 27 June 2007


Article Checklist for "Pythagorean theorem"
Workgroup category or categories Mathematics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Andrey Khalyavin 07:31, 27 June 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Wikipedia's article on this topic is so good that I'm tempted to copy it over to here. Thoughts? Michael Hardy 22:20, 15 May 2007 (CDT)

Too many proofs on that page. I got tired of reading and never made it to the uses, etc. I would suggest you limit our article to a few of the more famous proofs and see about making the history section a little less dry.--Joe Quick (Talk) 22:48, 15 May 2007 (CDT)