Talk:Binary economics: Difference between revisions
imported>Janos Abel (restart discussion of Binary economic--the new paradigm) |
imported>Janos Abel mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Is that discussion available somewhere for reference and possibly for another attempt to produce an article on the subject? | Is that discussion available somewhere for reference and possibly for another attempt to produce an article on the subject? | ||
Part of the difficulty lies in the paradigmatic nature of Binary economics: it is outside the conventional framework of economic thought (although it is not just original research). I believe that there must be a way of treating such "heretic" subjects and still comply with citizendium/wikipedia standards. | |||
[[User:Janos Abel|Janos Abel]] 06:31, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | [[User:Janos Abel|Janos Abel]] 06:31, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:50, 14 May 2007
There was a useful discussion around an article on Binary Economics. An unresolved dispute occurred and as a result the article was withdrawn. However, the discussion had some important references to the fact that the issued raised in Binary Economics (a new paradigm of economic theory) need to be addressed.
Is that discussion available somewhere for reference and possibly for another attempt to produce an article on the subject?
Part of the difficulty lies in the paradigmatic nature of Binary economics: it is outside the conventional framework of economic thought (although it is not just original research). I believe that there must be a way of treating such "heretic" subjects and still comply with citizendium/wikipedia standards.
Janos Abel 06:31, 14 May 2007 (CDT)