User talk:Robert Rubin: Difference between revisions
imported>Russell Potter (Literature article to be featured) |
imported>Russell Potter |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Hi Robert, | Hi Robert, | ||
The toplevel Literature article has just been featured tody as a "developed" article on the "for Approval" page (see notes on [[Talk:Literature]]) -- this could really help give us a boost, as Editors in other field will be be needed if we're to get it through the approval process. | |||
I think it looks very good, but the ending seems to just taper off -- maybe we can do something to give it a more 'finished' feel, and perhaps enrich the biliography as well. I've thought about a 'further resources' section as well, but perhaps that can wait a bit .... also if we could find a couple of additional public-domain imaes that fit, that would be great. Many thanks for your work so far, and I hope we can keep this momentum going! cheers, [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 06:48, 3 May 2007 (CDT) | I think it looks very good, but the ending seems to just taper off -- maybe we can do something to give it a more 'finished' feel, and perhaps enrich the biliography as well. I've thought about a 'further resources' section as well, but perhaps that can wait a bit .... also if we could find a couple of additional public-domain imaes that fit, that would be great. Many thanks for your work so far, and I hope we can keep this momentum going! cheers, [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 06:48, 3 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 08:05, 3 May 2007
Robert -- welcome!! Very glad to see you've made it in the door. I just now noticed (and posted a response to) your item on the forums -- but let's, by all means, carry on the talk on the Talk:Literature page. Russell Potter 13:05, 27 April 2007 (CDT)
Literature article to be featured
Hi Robert,
The toplevel Literature article has just been featured tody as a "developed" article on the "for Approval" page (see notes on Talk:Literature) -- this could really help give us a boost, as Editors in other field will be be needed if we're to get it through the approval process.
I think it looks very good, but the ending seems to just taper off -- maybe we can do something to give it a more 'finished' feel, and perhaps enrich the biliography as well. I've thought about a 'further resources' section as well, but perhaps that can wait a bit .... also if we could find a couple of additional public-domain imaes that fit, that would be great. Many thanks for your work so far, and I hope we can keep this momentum going! cheers, Russell Potter 06:48, 3 May 2007 (CDT)