Talk:Renaissance: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthony Argyriou
(this is still a stub, not a developing article)
imported>Anthony Argyriou
(comment a(and sign old comment))
Line 12: Line 12:


Hi Everyone!
Hi Everyone!
I have started this page! Please feel free to add to it. Please reference all of your sources. Cheers! :)
I have started this page! Please feel free to add to it. Please reference all of your sources. Cheers! :){{unsigned2| 17:15, 29 March 2007|Matthew Harward}}


Thanks for starting this. Maybe we should make the title Renaissance (European) ? Anyway, I stated that focus in the introduction. [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 20:27, 29 March 2007 (CDT)
Thanks for starting this. Maybe we should make the title Renaissance (European) ? Anyway, I stated that focus in the introduction. [[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 20:27, 29 March 2007 (CDT)
I've downgraded this to a stub. There's enough of an outline that can be built on to create a good article, so it's not really a candidate for deletion, but it hasn't developed in a while. [[User:Anthony Argyriou|Anthony Argyriou]] 13:27, 26 July 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 13:27, 26 July 2007


Article Checklist for "Renaissance"
Workgroup category or categories History Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Anthony Argyriou 13:25, 26 July 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Hi Everyone! I have started this page! Please feel free to add to it. Please reference all of your sources. Cheers! :)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matthew Harward (talkcontribs) 17:15, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for starting this. Maybe we should make the title Renaissance (European) ? Anyway, I stated that focus in the introduction. Nancy Sculerati 20:27, 29 March 2007 (CDT)

I've downgraded this to a stub. There's enough of an outline that can be built on to create a good article, so it's not really a candidate for deletion, but it hasn't developed in a while. Anthony Argyriou 13:27, 26 July 2007 (CDT)