Talk:United States Congress: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Steve Mount
imported>Richard Jensen
(overthrow?)
Line 22: Line 22:
::I think it's less ponderous. Note that Library of Congress uses "U.S. Congress" in its formal siteshttp://thomas.loc.gov/links/]  The House calls itself "The United States House" but calls the Senate "U.S. Senate"[http://www.house.gov/]  The Senate uses both long and short forms (U.S. Senate). The  Chicago manual of style OK's U.S. as adjective (section 15.34 -- it also allows just US instead of U.S.) AP Manual of style says: ok as adjective. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 09:50, 26 April 2007 (CDT)
::I think it's less ponderous. Note that Library of Congress uses "U.S. Congress" in its formal siteshttp://thomas.loc.gov/links/]  The House calls itself "The United States House" but calls the Senate "U.S. Senate"[http://www.house.gov/]  The Senate uses both long and short forms (U.S. Senate). The  Chicago manual of style OK's U.S. as adjective (section 15.34 -- it also allows just US instead of U.S.) AP Manual of style says: ok as adjective. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 09:50, 26 April 2007 (CDT)
:::You already did it for the Constitution, so I guess go for it here.  Scared me for a minute there :) [[User:Steve Mount|Steve Mount]] 22:28, 26 April 2007 (CDT)
:::You already did it for the Constitution, so I guess go for it here.  Scared me for a minute there :) [[User:Steve Mount|Steve Mount]] 22:28, 26 April 2007 (CDT)
::::I would never try to overthrow the Constitution, only rename the article. :) [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 23:06, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 23:06, 26 April 2007


Article Checklist for "United States Congress"
Workgroup category or categories Politics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by -Versuri 11:45, 26 March 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.




Trivial change: "infamous" is a very non-neutral word. Notorious isn't necessarily negative. Perhaps a simple famous would be better, but definitely not egregious. Daniel Drake 02:18, 4 April 2007 (CDT)

I agree "infamous" was not a good choice, though I struggled more with that word than nearly any other in the article! "Famous" sounded like something I'd use for Britney Spears... Maybe I need to just rephrase the whole thing. Thanks for the spelling and grammar check on the rest of it. Steve Mount 15:38, 4 April 2007 (CDT) [edit: ok, I thought "famous" sounded more reasonable there than I initially thought. Regardless of your "side" in the revolution, I think the word is appropriate.]

change name to U.S. Congress for consistency

any objection to changing the name to U.S. Congress for consistency? Richard Jensen 06:03, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

I don't know. Don't you think it sounds too informal?--José Leonardo Andrade 09:20, 26 April 2007 (CDT)

I think it's less ponderous. Note that Library of Congress uses "U.S. Congress" in its formal siteshttp://thomas.loc.gov/links/] The House calls itself "The United States House" but calls the Senate "U.S. Senate"[1] The Senate uses both long and short forms (U.S. Senate). The Chicago manual of style OK's U.S. as adjective (section 15.34 -- it also allows just US instead of U.S.) AP Manual of style says: ok as adjective. Richard Jensen 09:50, 26 April 2007 (CDT)
You already did it for the Constitution, so I guess go for it here. Scared me for a minute there :) Steve Mount 22:28, 26 April 2007 (CDT)
I would never try to overthrow the Constitution, only rename the article. :) Richard Jensen 23:06, 26 April 2007 (CDT)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:United_States_Congress&oldid=171744"