Talk:International Baccalaureate Organisation: Difference between revisions
imported>Ryan McCue |
imported>Joe Quick No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I actually wrote the article using Programs then half way through I took a look at the IB website and it had programmes, so I changed them. [[User:Ryan McCue|Ryan McCue]] <sup>[[User_talk:Ryan McCue|Let's have a chat]]</sup> 01:50, 1 March 2007 (CST) | :I actually wrote the article using Programs then half way through I took a look at the IB website and it had programmes, so I changed them. [[User:Ryan McCue|Ryan McCue]] <sup>[[User_talk:Ryan McCue|Let's have a chat]]</sup> 01:50, 1 March 2007 (CST) | ||
==Before we go any further== | |||
It struck me as I was thinking about how to formulate the introductory section that it might be better (and easier) if we redirect this page to one named [[International Baccalaureate Organisation]]. I think this might be more accurate and it would free us up somewhat stylistically. [[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] | [[User talk:Joe Quick|Talk]] 04:09, 1 March 2007 (CST) |
Revision as of 04:09, 1 March 2007
Language Usage
Since the IBO is based in Geneva and publishes its own content according to British spelling conventions, I suggest we try to stick to those conventions in other places on this page. This is going to put us at odds with much of the CZ content, but we can't very well turn their officially titled "programmes" into "programs" so let's keep things consistent.
This means that you'll need to keep an eye on my contributions. :) Please don't hesitate to re-colour my colors. --Joe Quick | Talk
- I actually wrote the article using Programs then half way through I took a look at the IB website and it had programmes, so I changed them. Ryan McCue Let's have a chat 01:50, 1 March 2007 (CST)
Before we go any further
It struck me as I was thinking about how to formulate the introductory section that it might be better (and easier) if we redirect this page to one named International Baccalaureate Organisation. I think this might be more accurate and it would free us up somewhat stylistically. Joe Quick | Talk 04:09, 1 March 2007 (CST)