User talk:Damien Storey: Difference between revisions
imported>Michael MacNeil (Re: Scientology (Doctrine)) |
imported>Michael MacNeil (Fixed Link) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I've restored [[Elenchus]], let me know if anything is still missing[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 06:06, 21 February 2007 (CST) | I've restored [[Elenchus]], let me know if anything is still missing[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 06:06, 21 February 2007 (CST) | ||
== Re: [[Scientology ( | == Re: [[Scientology (doctrine)]] == | ||
Hello. I noted your comment about how deletion of the article would constitute a relief, and really do have to agree with you. I also agree about a huge criticism section, in my heart of hearts. But, as someone who has been victimized by Scientology, I do have to note that maybe the best way to put a thorn in the lion's foot is, indeed, to write a truthful and neutral article. I spend a lot of time on schooling and similar right now, so frankly, if you're so disposed, maybe you could lend a hand with it since you seemed to express interest? IF not, I fully understand. In the meantime, I'm devising a replacement article, one that mentions Xenu and other core aspects of the doctrine, including the invisible alien ghosts. Thanks for your time. [[User:Michael MacNeil|Michael MacNeil]] 13:00, 25 May 2007 (CDT) | Hello. I noted your comment about how deletion of the article would constitute a relief, and really do have to agree with you. I also agree about a huge criticism section, in my heart of hearts. But, as someone who has been victimized by Scientology, I do have to note that maybe the best way to put a thorn in the lion's foot is, indeed, to write a truthful and neutral article. I spend a lot of time on schooling and similar right now, so frankly, if you're so disposed, maybe you could lend a hand with it since you seemed to express interest? IF not, I fully understand. In the meantime, I'm devising a replacement article, one that mentions Xenu and other core aspects of the doctrine, including the invisible alien ghosts. Thanks for your time. [[User:Michael MacNeil|Michael MacNeil]] 13:00, 25 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:00, 25 May 2007
I've restored Elenchus, let me know if anything is still missingGareth Leng 06:06, 21 February 2007 (CST)
Re: Scientology (doctrine)
Hello. I noted your comment about how deletion of the article would constitute a relief, and really do have to agree with you. I also agree about a huge criticism section, in my heart of hearts. But, as someone who has been victimized by Scientology, I do have to note that maybe the best way to put a thorn in the lion's foot is, indeed, to write a truthful and neutral article. I spend a lot of time on schooling and similar right now, so frankly, if you're so disposed, maybe you could lend a hand with it since you seemed to express interest? IF not, I fully understand. In the meantime, I'm devising a replacement article, one that mentions Xenu and other core aspects of the doctrine, including the invisible alien ghosts. Thanks for your time. Michael MacNeil 13:00, 25 May 2007 (CDT)