Category talk:Chemistry Workgroup (Top): Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mark Rust
No edit summary
imported>Howard Arvi Hughes
(Backup - top priority)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Nuclear chemistry might be improved with time, but I think that we now have a reasonable introduction to the topic. I think that a journalist or a undergraduate student would be able to get a reasonable overview of some of the history and scope of the subject by reading the page. The page has now gone live and I think it might be worthy of approval. [[User:Mark Rust|Mark Rust]]
Nuclear chemistry might be improved with time, but I think that we now have a reasonable introduction to the topic. I think that a journalist or a undergraduate student would be able to get a reasonable overview of some of the history and scope of the subject by reading the page. The page has now gone live and I think it might be worthy of approval. [[User:Mark Rust|Mark Rust]]
Hi Mark, the place to say this is [[Talk:Nuclear chemistry]].
Sounds great, please do help drive this process forward. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:37, 23 December 2006 (CST)
Sorry for putting it in the wrong place, I thought that the category talk was for discussing articles which the other editors might want to approve or disapprove of.[[User:Mark Rust|Mark Rust]]
=== Backup -  top priority ===
*Analytical chemistry
*Biochemistry
*Chemistry
*Computational chemistry
*Inorganic chemistry
*Nuclear chemistry
*Organic chemistry
*Organometallic chemistry
*Physical chemistry
*Quantum chemistry
*Theoretical chemistry

Latest revision as of 06:13, 20 January 2007

Nuclear chemistry might be improved with time, but I think that we now have a reasonable introduction to the topic. I think that a journalist or a undergraduate student would be able to get a reasonable overview of some of the history and scope of the subject by reading the page. The page has now gone live and I think it might be worthy of approval. Mark Rust

Hi Mark, the place to say this is Talk:Nuclear chemistry.

Sounds great, please do help drive this process forward. --Larry Sanger 12:37, 23 December 2006 (CST)

Sorry for putting it in the wrong place, I thought that the category talk was for discussing articles which the other editors might want to approve or disapprove of.Mark Rust

Backup - top priority

  • Analytical chemistry
  • Biochemistry
  • Chemistry
  • Computational chemistry
  • Inorganic chemistry
  • Nuclear chemistry
  • Organic chemistry
  • Organometallic chemistry
  • Physical chemistry
  • Quantum chemistry
  • Theoretical chemistry
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category_talk:Chemistry_Workgroup_(Top)&oldid=11718"