Talk:Horizontal gene transfer/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Gareth Leng No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ToApprove|editor=Gareth Leng|url=http://pilot.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Horizontal_gene_transfer&oldid=100016219|group=Biology|date=January 6, 2006}} | |||
I think you've done a great job here David[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 06:14, 31 December 2006 (CST) | |||
I understand where the Mariner name came from but is it relevant to have the verses in the abstract? The context of the verses are not made clear and it leads to confusion as currently presented. Wouldn't it be more appropriate in the transposon section? [[User:Chris day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris day|(Talk)]] 16:16, 3 December 2006 (CST) | I understand where the Mariner name came from but is it relevant to have the verses in the abstract? The context of the verses are not made clear and it leads to confusion as currently presented. Wouldn't it be more appropriate in the transposon section? [[User:Chris day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris day|(Talk)]] 16:16, 3 December 2006 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 07:14, 31 December 2006
 |
I think you've done a great job here DavidGareth Leng 06:14, 31 December 2006 (CST)
I understand where the Mariner name came from but is it relevant to have the verses in the abstract? The context of the verses are not made clear and it leads to confusion as currently presented. Wouldn't it be more appropriate in the transposon section? Chris Day (Talk) 16:16, 3 December 2006 (CST)
Nice article. I've done some tidying of the reference formatting. Think you should decide either to abbreviate HGT or not, at present it's mixed.Gareth Leng 09:02, 23 December 2006 (CST)
Also, looking at this for one second, I see the title phrase is made bold several times. It should be boldened only the first time --Larry Sanger 21:41, 23 December 2006 (CST)