Talk:Office for the Administrative Review of Detained Enemy Combatants: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>J. Noel Chiappa
m (Fix problem with WPauthor)
 
Line 5: Line 5:


No from wikipedia discalimer is necessary. Cheers! |[[User:George Swan|George Swan]] 16:59, 26 October 2007 (CDT)}}
No from wikipedia discalimer is necessary. Cheers! |[[User:George Swan|George Swan]] 16:59, 26 October 2007 (CDT)}}
== Should this article be kept or deleted? ==
Should this article be kept or deleted?
John Leach [https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Office_for_the_Administrative_Review_of_Detained_Enemy_Combatants&diff=931517&oldid=929193 tagged] this article for deletion on 2024-03-13, without however providing any justification for doing so, either here on the talk page, or in his edit summary.
Personally, I don't think there is any doubt that this agency, and the tribunals it operated, were extremely important, so I think the article should be kept.  [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] ([[User talk:George Swan|talk]]) 13:45, 10 May 2024 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 13:45, 10 May 2024


Fountain pen.png
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page.
In lieu of WP notice:

I was essentially the sole author of a version of this article that appeared on the wikipedia. [1]

No from wikipedia discalimer is necessary. Cheers!

George Swan 16:59, 26 October 2007 (CDT)

Should this article be kept or deleted?

Should this article be kept or deleted?

John Leach tagged this article for deletion on 2024-03-13, without however providing any justification for doing so, either here on the talk page, or in his edit summary.

Personally, I don't think there is any doubt that this agency, and the tribunals it operated, were extremely important, so I think the article should be kept. George Swan (talk) 13:45, 10 May 2024 (CDT)