Talk:Irish Famine: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
m (Talk:The Irish Famine moved to Talk:Irish Famine: style--drop leading article)
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Irish Famine, The
|                cat1 = History
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = n
|                  by = [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 10:33, 2 September 2007 (CDT); [[User:Anton Sweeney|Anton Sweeney]] 09:46, 3 September 2007 (CDT)
}}


==I need someone to neutralise this==
==I need someone to neutralise this==

Revision as of 20:52, 3 November 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition "The failure of the potato crop from 1845-1852 in Ireland, which, coupled with food exports, led to mass starvation and emigration." [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category History [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

I need someone to neutralise this

I think there is some bias in this article which literally poured out of me as I wrote it. The major issues here are:

A) Government economic policy was not favourable to disaster relief - does my wording need changing?

B) The Catholic Churches well documented lack of active relief work - Am I being a bit too harsh here?

There are others as well, so it may need some altering here and there (Never mind several grammer mistakes I'm seeing everywhere) Denis Cavanagh 12:51, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

About to do a copyedit for spelling and grammar. On a) and b) - at first reading, it looks ok to me. Sources and references would obviously be good. Anton Sweeney 16:35, 2 September 2007 (CDT)

coverage

The article is heavy on government responses, but light on the famine itself. I will add more details. Richard Jensen 21:35, 3 September 2007 (CDT)