Talk:Frederick C. Roecker, Jr.: Difference between revisions
imported>Jacob F. Roecker No edit summary |
imported>Russell Potter (formatting) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
-Jacob Roecker | -Jacob Roecker | ||
== formatting == | |||
Hi Jacob, | |||
Great entry there, good use of family history. I would just say, instead of the "double header" format, it's best for consistency to just stick with the standard CZ entry style, which calls for the article name first and in '''boldface''' as the first word or phrase of the first sentence. The extra headers make it seem as though the article's subject is on a sort of textual pedestal. [[User:Russell Potter|Russell Potter]] 09:09, 25 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 09:09, 25 April 2007
I am aware that submitted articles aren't supposed to be self-promoting or about less-than-prominent people. Since this is the second article I've generated--and I need the practice--I decided to go with something that I knew. This biography is from my father, and the photos from our family archives.
Sorry if this article is too self-promoting, but I'd rather play around with how to make articles on something I know no one else will be editing. :-)
Thanks!
-Jacob Roecker
formatting
Hi Jacob,
Great entry there, good use of family history. I would just say, instead of the "double header" format, it's best for consistency to just stick with the standard CZ entry style, which calls for the article name first and in boldface as the first word or phrase of the first sentence. The extra headers make it seem as though the article's subject is on a sort of textual pedestal. Russell Potter 09:09, 25 April 2007 (CDT)