Talk:Linux distribution: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Eric M Gearhart (Marking article 'From Wikipedia') |
imported>Tim Chambers (Gridter) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Argh it looks like the original editor's account (Anees Ahmed) isn't even here anymore. I'll mark it WP for now, and modify it in the future so that it's got "Live" status --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 06:53, 6 April 2007 (CDT) | :Argh it looks like the original editor's account (Anees Ahmed) isn't even here anymore. I'll mark it WP for now, and modify it in the future so that it's got "Live" status --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 06:53, 6 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Gridter == | |||
I visited http://www.gridter.com/linx/linux.html and noticed that the page equates [[Solaris]] with Linux, which is absurd. The grid also includes [[BSD]] distributions. Is CZ tarnished by linking to such blatant disinformation? Would some sort of disclaimer be appropriate? ''<>< [[User:Tim Chambers|Tim Chambers]] 12:33, 7 April 2007 (CDT)'' | |||
Revision as of 12:33, 7 April 2007
Is this from WP? If so, please so mark it --Larry Sanger 16:04, 5 April 2007 (CDT)
- Argh it looks like the original editor's account (Anees Ahmed) isn't even here anymore. I'll mark it WP for now, and modify it in the future so that it's got "Live" status --Eric M Gearhart 06:53, 6 April 2007 (CDT)
Gridter
I visited http://www.gridter.com/linx/linux.html and noticed that the page equates Solaris with Linux, which is absurd. The grid also includes BSD distributions. Is CZ tarnished by linking to such blatant disinformation? Would some sort of disclaimer be appropriate? <>< Tim Chambers 12:33, 7 April 2007 (CDT)